It's a controversial opinion, but let's face it: endings can make or break a movie. And when it comes to the critically acclaimed Bad Education, some viewers might argue that the original ending left them wanting more.
Well, fear not, because we've got an alternative ending that will leave you on the edge of your seat, questioning everything you thought you knew about this gripping tale.
In this article, we delve into the depths of the Bad Education movie, exploring the psychological twists and turns that make it so captivating, and present you with a mind-bending conclusion that will have you reevaluating everything you thought you knew.
Get ready for a rollercoaster ride of emotions as we unveil the alternate ending to Bad Education that you never saw coming.
The story takes an unexpected turn.
The new ending
As the credits roll, the audience is left in shock, their minds racing to comprehend the unexpected turn of events. The original story of Bad Education takes a daring twist, pushing the boundaries of the established narrative and leaving viewers with a sense of awe and intrigue.
Frank Tassone, the charismatic superintendent played by Hugh Jackman, is not the mastermind behind the embezzlement scheme. Instead, it is revealed that Pam Gluckin, the assistant superintendent portrayed by Allison Janney, has been orchestrating the entire operation from behind the scenes.
Throughout the film, Pam has been portrayed as a loyal and dedicated employee, supporting Frank in his endeavors. However, as the story unfolds, it becomes clear that she has been manipulating him all along, using his charm and influence to cover her tracks.
The revelation comes when Rachel Bhargava, a student journalist played by Geraldine Viswanathan, stumbles upon a hidden ledger in Pam's office. The ledger contains evidence of Pam's embezzlement, meticulously documenting her fraudulent activities over the years.
Rachel confronts Pam, who initially denies any involvement. But as the evidence piles up, Pam's facade crumbles, and she confesses to her crimes. She reveals that she had been embezzling funds long before Frank arrived, and she saw an opportunity to escalate her scheme under his leadership.
The twist sends shockwaves through the community, as everyone had believed Frank to be the mastermind. The revelation not only tarnishes Frank's reputation but also raises questions about the true nature of power and manipulation.
As the story concludes, Frank, devastated by the betrayal, is forced to confront his own naivety and blind trust. He realizes that his desire for recognition and success had blinded him to the truth, allowing Pam to exploit his vulnerabilities.
How could they have been so easily deceived? What other secrets lie beneath the surface? It challenges viewers to reevaluate their perceptions of trust and authority, reminding them that appearances can be deceiving.
In the final scene, Frank, now a broken man, reflects on the events that unfolded. He contemplates the consequences of his actions and the impact they have had on the students, the community, and himself.
The film ends on a note of introspection, leaving the audience to ponder the complexities of human nature and the choices we make.
Questions for discussions
I have imagined other alternative endings; check the link below or in the sidebar.
Bad Education story / Synopsis + complete story - DR1 2020
Bad Education explained / Understanding the ending and story - DR1 2020
The Scandalous Tale: A Corrupt System Unveiled in a Riveting Drama - DR1 2020
It's time to share this post on your social media to spark some discussion: